It is incredibly accurate, sonically tight, defined - and without adding the "clinical sterility" that I've experienced in PT. The audio was crystal clear, defined, tight. When listening in Samplitude, the difference was immediate - as if someone had flipped some kind of "sonic truth" switch. so if I wanted to add sparkle on top, I needed to add more of the desired frequency range than I did in Samplitude.
#SAMPLITUDE PRO X2 DOWNLOAD PRO#
Pro Tools wasn't much better, except it seemed that I needed to use more of a particular processor ( stock PT Plugs) to get the desired results I was seeking. I don't know what it is technically, but I can tell you that the result is a "smeared" and "phasey" sound. I took tracks - exactly the same tracks - and imported them into Sonar, PT, and Samplitude. I decided to do an apples to apples comparison. What I didn't realize at that time was that besides having nothing to lose, I had everything to gain. There was a thirty day trial period, so I figured I had nothing to lose. Several months ago, I decided to give Samplitude a try. I also continued to work with PT quite a bit as well, because I had clients who had projects in that format, who would bring their tracks in to me to either mix or add tracks to.
As the years went by, I got to know it inside and out. I went with Sonar because it did integrate audio and midi very well.
In fact, my engineering peers at that time who used PT had to also use Digital Performer just so that they could work on the midi end of their productions. I've been using Sonar for a hundred years now, I started using Cakewalk Pro back in the mid 90's when I was doing quite a bit of MIDI production and at that time, Pro Tools was shaky on the integration of audio and MIDI. because once you do, you won't think that way anymore. Those of you who follow the general mindset that all DAW's are the same should give this program a try. I've spent the last few days working within Samplitude Pro X Suite, and it is simply fantastic.
0 kommentar(er)
